http://blog.scifi.com/battlestar/
*loves*
This also revives my endless fascination with the complexities that characterise the producer/audience relationship nowadays in science ficition and related areas. Oh, granted, that relationship has always been... interesting in print sf, what with most writers initally starting out in fandom; but now the same thing seems to be happening to the much more complex and commercialised field of SF tv and movies. Today's producers of SF tv and movies are fans, or at least those of the shows that have the most appeal to fannish types are. Joss Whedon, Ronald D. Moore, Rockne O'Bannon, Richard Manning, J. Michael Straczynski, Peter Jackson, Sam Raimi, to some degree even David Kemper... they all speak our language, belong to our culture to some degree. Of course, that only makes the relationship between 'them' and 'us' more complicated. To some degree 'they' are 'us', but 'they' are also 'them', in the context of a system in which 'they' have more power over content than we do... although that's tempting to forget...
Anyway, I'm rambling. I have to write something here soon about my new job and the tenderness of construction machines, but I have no time for that tonight, and tomorrow I'm meeting the Frankfurt Scapers.
*loves*
This also revives my endless fascination with the complexities that characterise the producer/audience relationship nowadays in science ficition and related areas. Oh, granted, that relationship has always been... interesting in print sf, what with most writers initally starting out in fandom; but now the same thing seems to be happening to the much more complex and commercialised field of SF tv and movies. Today's producers of SF tv and movies are fans, or at least those of the shows that have the most appeal to fannish types are. Joss Whedon, Ronald D. Moore, Rockne O'Bannon, Richard Manning, J. Michael Straczynski, Peter Jackson, Sam Raimi, to some degree even David Kemper... they all speak our language, belong to our culture to some degree. Of course, that only makes the relationship between 'them' and 'us' more complicated. To some degree 'they' are 'us', but 'they' are also 'them', in the context of a system in which 'they' have more power over content than we do... although that's tempting to forget...
Anyway, I'm rambling. I have to write something here soon about my new job and the tenderness of construction machines, but I have no time for that tonight, and tomorrow I'm meeting the Frankfurt Scapers.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-11 05:23 am (UTC)Hate to repeat mysef, but: did you get my emails?
Yes, sorry.
Date: 2005-02-13 02:24 pm (UTC)From Scapekid
Date: 2005-02-11 10:34 am (UTC)Re: From Scapekid
Date: 2005-02-13 02:26 pm (UTC)Re: From Scapekid
Date: 2005-02-14 04:21 pm (UTC)*is a happy battlestar galacticite*
Re: From Scapekid
Date: 2005-02-15 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 11:11 am (UTC)Ich weiß nicht, wie es Dir ging, ich fand den Stammtisch gestern nicht besonders schön/gelungen/angenehm. VIelleicht war es die Sitzordung (ich komme mit einigen Leuten einfach nciht klar) oder dass ich vor lauter Jenny nicht an Andura herankam (Jenny hockt da immer wie eine Glucke drauf...). Und wir konnten uns auch nicht unterhalten, weil wir soweit voneinander entfernt saßen. :( Sehr schade. Zusammen mit der lahmen Bedienung und Bettina im Kostüm ergab das irgendwie keine Mischung, die ich gemocht hätte.
Wollen wir mal wieder ein Schwesterntreffen auf die Beine stellen? Ich vermisse euch beide! Und wenn wir uns schon nur sporadisch sehen und dann auch nicht mal schwätzen können, ist total doof.
Sorry to hear that...
Date: 2005-02-13 02:29 pm (UTC)Arrgh, wieso schreibe ich denn Englisch??? Ähhh...
ALso, jedenfalls, wir können uns gerne wieder mal zu dritt treffen, denn jetzt kann ich ja wieder freier über meine Zeit verfügen! Yay! Also: Jederzeit, sagt mir einfach, wann! Nur nicht Freitag oder Samstag tagsüber, denn das sind meine beiden Arbeitstage, da bin ich bis 17:00 beschäftigt. Aber nach 17:00 geht's natürlich.